Literature Review

 

LITERATURE REVIEW
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Milkau_B%C3%BCcherschrank_mit_angekettetem_Buch_aus_der_Bibliothek_von_Cesena_109-2.jpg

Literature Review. The term “literature review” refers to the process of checking for existing research related to one’s research topic or question. Before proceeding to the following steps, researchers examine previous research to see where gaps exist and to discover related research which might guide or influence the nature one’s study. The existence of gaps in the literature lends support to a researcher’s claim that his/her study has special significance or importance. Additionally, in the process of reviewing the literature, the researcher begins to assemble the relevant sources which will inform the study and be included in the final bibliography or references section.

 

Finding and selecting sources. There are many excellent sources for finding research related almost every topic. Most sources can be found in large-scale databases which are available on the internet. Some databases are free, while others require a subscription in order access the full text documents. Each discipline has databases which are specific to the field of study and one should learn to know the important databases related one’s realms of interest. There are also several general databases which provide researchers with an initial search of literature. Wikipedia provides a comprehensive list of available databases at the following LINK. To begin a research project, students can start with the general databases below:

 

o   Worldcat. Worldcat is an online database of most of the books and theses owned by the major libraries of the world. The books themselves are not available via Worldcat, but by searching this database researchers can see what books relate to their research question and they can at least access the basic bilbliographic information about the source (i.e., author, title, publication details). Worldcat does not include journal articles.

o   Google Scholar. Google scholar accesses both journal articles and books, but tends to favor the selection of journal articles and theses. Search results also usually indicate whether a particular source is available in full text form, either HTML or PDF.

o   JStor. Although it requires a subscription, JStore is especially useful because it indexes 2000 scholarly journals and includes full versions of all articles in the database.

 

In order to search these databases, one must learn how to search efficiently. Here are some tips:

o   Do not use search terms which are too broad; it will return too many results making it difficult to choose which sources to consult. Use multiple adjectives in order to narrow the results.

o   Use quotation marks to get specific results. For example, if one wants to search articles on Nelson Mandela, place his name inside quotation marks:  “Nelson Mandela.” Otherwise, the search engines will return all instances of Nelson and all instances of Mandela.

 

Below are screen shots of search results from Google Scholar and Worldcat. The search phrase was:  Choma Zambia internet service. No quotation marks were used. One could just as easily search with:  Choma Zambia “internet service” and narrowed the search further.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selecting good sources. One must be careful to select sources carefully. Using a basic Google search via the internet will return thousands of webpages and documents, but the quality of information on those webpages or documents varies and, frankly, much of it cannot be trusted. Seasoned researchers are very critical of sources and scrutinize them carefully before using them. Some lecturers and institutions forbid the use of Wikipedia, for example, because it sometimes lacks sufficient rigor and/or referencing. In the end, students and faculty must keep a critical eye and review sources for accuracy and solid scholarly referencing. One should even be critical of studies published in professional journals and scrutinize the methodology of the work and the validity of the research.

 

Controlling and organizing your sources. As researchers collect sources for a project, they control and organize them by following some basic research principles and using several key methods. First and foremost, good researchers take careful notes as they do their research. Careless note taking leads to confused results and lost time trying to find information. Second, a good researcher always has an organizing system by which to control notes and sources. The better your system, the better your research will be. So, get in the habit of taking careful notes and develop a good organizational system. The “old school” method of gathering information and sources was to use small cards with notes. Some researchers have boxes and boxes of carefully indexed notes and sources which help them when it is time write their final documents.

 

In recent years, researchers have begun to rely on computer programs to help them control and organize notes and sources. One method is to use a bibliographic program as the basis for research work. Zotero is an open source program which can easily manage large numbers of sources and can also be used to organize research notes. A variety of other programs exist which can be helpful: note taking apps, mini databases, etc. Many are available for smartphones and the collected data can be linked to the cloud or to desktop and laptop programs. Whether by “old school” or “new school” methods, create a personal system to control and organize your notes and your sources.

 

Writing up the Literature Review. After obtaining search results from the various databases, researchers read or skim the sources to see if they are truly relevant to the study. And, as mentioned above, a good researcher examines sources with a critical eye to be sure the information is accurate and well-documented. If the sources are strong, researchers organize them into groups according to like categories in order to write the final literature review. At times, researchers might include material from someone because the information is widely accepted but they believe it is incorrect and they intend to dispute it in their own research.